Best Hyperline alternatives for HubSpot teams (2026)

Hyperline is a great tool — but it's a billing platform, not a document automation tool. It manages subscription plans, metered usage, and recurring invoices for SaaS and subscription businesses. That's a genuinely important job. But when HubSpot sales teams come looking for a way to generate proposals, send contracts, collect e-signatures, and have signed documents appear on deal records automatically, Hyperline isn't built for that problem.

I work at Portant, so I'll be transparent about that upfront. But the reason teams end up comparing document automation tools to Hyperline is usually the same: they searched for "invoice automation" or "document generation for HubSpot," found Hyperline, and then discovered it solves the wrong half of the revenue workflow. This article evaluates 10 tools designed for what HubSpot sales teams actually need — the pre-close document lifecycle — and scores them honestly on HubSpot integration depth, template flexibility, pricing, and end-to-end e-signature workflow.

Why HubSpot teams look for Hyperline alternatives

The core issue isn't that Hyperline is bad at what it does. It's that what it does — subscription billing and usage-based revenue management — is a post-close problem. The documents it generates are invoices. HubSpot sales teams sending out a proposal to a new prospect, routing a contract through a manager for approval, or collecting signatures from two counterparties aren't working on a billing problem. They're working on a document automation problem.

Three patterns come up consistently when teams realise Hyperline isn't the right fit. First, they need to populate a Google Docs or Word contract template with real data from a HubSpot deal — company name, deal value, contract term, line items — and Hyperline has no concept of a contract template. Second, they need someone to review and approve the document before it goes out, and approval routing doesn't exist in a billing tool. Third, they need the signed PDF to land on the HubSpot deal record so the pipeline reflects what has actually happened — and Hyperline's HubSpot sync covers billing data, not document status.

The result is that teams using Hyperline still have a manual step: downloading an invoice or creating a separate document in another tool, formatting it, sending it via email, chasing signatures manually, and updating HubSpot by hand. That's the gap a proper document automation tool fills.

Quick comparison

Tool	Best for	HubSpot integration	Starting price	Free plan	G2
Portant	HubSpot-native doc automation	Native (certified app)	$42/mo workspace	Yes (30 credits/mo)	4.7/5
PandaDoc	Editor-first doc platform	Integration (sync)	$49/user/mo	No (14-day trial)	4.7/5
Proposify	Polished proposal editor	Integration (sync)	$49/user/mo	No (14-day trial)	4.6/5
Qwilr	Interactive web proposals	Integration (sync)	$35/user/mo	No (14-day trial)	4.5/5
DocuSign	Enterprise eSign compliance	Connector (envelope sync)	$45/user/mo	No (30-day trial)	4.5/5
Dropbox Sign	Lightweight eSign	Integration (sync)	$20/user/mo	No (30-day trial)	4.7/5
GetAccept	Sales engagement + docs	Integration (sync)	Custom pricing	No	4.6/5
Juro	Legal-led contract workflows	Integration (sync)	Custom pricing	No	4.7/5
HubSpot Quotes	Free native quotes	Native (built into HubSpot)	$0 with Sales Hub	Yes	4.4/5
Signaturely	Simple, affordable eSign	Via Zapier	From $25/mo	No (3 free requests)	4.8/5

G2 ratings as of May 2026. Prices shown are billed annually where applicable — check each vendor's site for current rates.

1. Portant — best for HubSpot-native document automation

G2: 4.7/5  ·  From $42/mo workspace  ·  Free plan: Yes (30 credits/mo)

Portant is purpose-built for the workflow Hyperline doesn't cover: generating sales documents from live HubSpot data, routing them through approval, collecting e-signatures, and having every signed document land back on the deal record automatically. It's the #1 HubSpot-certified document automation app, used by over 920,000 people across 40,000+ teams.

Where Hyperline takes over after a deal closes and manages what gets billed, Portant operates in the critical window before close — the proposals that frame the relationship, the contracts that define the terms, and the NDAs that unlock the due diligence conversation. Every document Portant generates is traceable back to a HubSpot deal, contact, or company record. When a prospect opens the proposal, when they sign the contract, when a manager approves the document — all of that writes back to HubSpot as properties your workflows can act on and your reports can surface.

The template story is worth dwelling on because it's usually where the friction is. Teams that have been using Hyperline for billing documentation typically have existing Word or Google Docs files that legal has signed off on — standard services agreements, master service agreements, NDAs. Portant uses those files directly as templates. You add merge tags where HubSpot data should appear, connect the template to a workflow, and Portant fills in every field from the linked deal record. No rebuilding in a proprietary editor. No re-exporting for legal review. The files your team already trusts become the foundation of an automated document workflow within a day or two of setup.

The HubSpot integration depth goes further than most tools in this category. Documents appear as their own records — not just notes on a deal timeline, but filterable, reportable objects linked to deals, contacts, and companies. You can build a HubSpot list of all deals where a contract has been sent but not yet signed, trigger a workflow when a document reaches signed status, or run a report showing average time-to-signature by deal owner. That's what it means for documents to live in HubSpot rather than alongside it.

Pricing is structured around workspaces rather than individual seats, which makes a significant difference for growing teams. A five-person sales team doesn't pay five times the per-seat rate — the whole team is covered under one workspace subscription. That's a fundamentally different cost structure from the per-user tools that dominate this space.

Key features

• Generates documents from live HubSpot deal, contact, company, and line item data
• Templates in Google Docs, Slides, Word, PowerPoint, or PDF — no proprietary editor required
• Every document saved back to HubSpot as its own record with full status history
• Sequential approval workflows with one-click approve/reject from inside HubSpot
• Built-in e-signature on paid plans — signing status updates HubSpot at each step
• Automation triggers: generate documents from deal stage changes, form submissions, or HubSpot workflows
• Conditional content logic — show or hide sections based on HubSpot field values
• Dynamic line item tables pulled directly from HubSpot products

Pros

• Flat workspace pricing — your whole team is covered without per-seat penalties as headcount grows
• No template migration — existing Google Docs and Word files work from day one
• Documents as HubSpot records means reporting, list-building, and workflow automation work natively
• Fast to set up — most teams are generating real documents within a day
• Free tier available with e-signature included — no credit card required to evaluate the full workflow

Cons

• No visual drag-and-drop builder — if reps want to design rich layouts from scratch inside the tool, the template-file approach feels less visual than PandaDoc or Proposify
• Document volume is credit-based on lower plans (30 credits/mo free, 2,000/mo on Pro)

For a detailed side-by-side on what separates document automation from billing, our Portant vs Hyperline comparison page covers both tools' use cases, HubSpot integration depth, and when teams use them together.

2. PandaDoc — best for editor-first document creation

G2: 4.7/5  ·  From $49/user/mo  ·  Free plan: No (14-day trial)

PandaDoc is the category standard for editor-first document automation. It's a dedicated platform for creating, sending, tracking, and signing proposals, contracts, and quotes — the direct opposite of Hyperline's billing focus. If your team is moving away from manual document creation because you need a purpose-built tool with a visual editor, a content library, and a structured signing workflow, PandaDoc covers all of that.

The HubSpot integration pulls deal data into documents and syncs activity and document status back to the CRM record. The limitation HubSpot-first teams encounter most often is that documents live in PandaDoc's own dashboard — not as native HubSpot records. Pipeline reporting on document status means opening a second tool rather than running a HubSpot report.

Key features

• Visual drag-and-drop editor with a reusable content and section library
• Built-in e-signature, interactive pricing tables, and video embedding
• Approval workflows, real-time viewer notifications, and engagement analytics
• HubSpot integration: deal data populates templates, activity and status sync back
• CPQ (configure, price, quote) functionality on higher plans

Pros

• Polished visual editor — strong for teams that want to design complex, brand-forward proposals
• Deep content library for organisations with standardised section blocks across many document types
• Well-known brand with a broad integrations ecosystem beyond HubSpot

Cons

• Per-seat pricing at $49/user/mo compounds fast — a 5-person team pays $245/mo before any add-ons
• Templates must be built inside PandaDoc's editor — existing Google Docs or Word files require migration
• Documents don't live as HubSpot records — pipeline reporting still requires checking PandaDoc

Best for: teams that need a purpose-built document platform with a rich visual editor and are comfortable with per-seat pricing and maintaining a second dashboard alongside HubSpot.

3. Proposify — best for polished, editor-first proposals

G2: 4.6/5  ·  From $49/user/mo  ·  Free plan: No (14-day trial)

Proposify is PandaDoc's closest direct competitor in the editor-first proposal category. It's built around a visual block editor, a structured content library, and collaborative review workflows — designed for teams where the proposal itself is a high-touch, heavily branded deliverable. If your team needs to design polished proposals with custom layouts and is willing to invest time building and maintaining a content library, Proposify is among the strongest options.

The HubSpot integration syncs deal data into proposals and logs activity back to the CRM, but the documents and reporting live in Proposify. For managers who track pipeline in HubSpot, that means checking two places to understand what's actually happening with outstanding documents.

Key features

• Visual block-based editor with drag-and-drop sections and a reusable content library
• E-signature, interactive pricing tables, and video embedding built in
• Approval workflows and real-time viewer notifications per proposal section
• HubSpot integration: deal data in, activity and status back out

Pros

• Polished editor that most reps find easier to use than PandaDoc's for layout-heavy, brand-forward proposals
• Strong content library for teams that need consistent branded sections reused across many proposals
• Robust engagement analytics — time spent per section, scroll depth, signer activity

Cons

• Per-seat pricing at $49/user/mo — same cost as PandaDoc Business for a comparable team size
• Documents live in Proposify, not HubSpot — managers need to leave the CRM for real document status
• Not a native HubSpot app — deeper reporting requires manual effort or third-party connectors

Best for: teams that want a polished editor-first proposal experience, have bandwidth to build and maintain a branded content library, and are comfortable managing document status outside HubSpot.

4. Qwilr — best for interactive web-based proposals

G2: 4.5/5  ·  From $35/user/mo  ·  Free plan: No (14-day trial)

Qwilr takes a fundamentally different approach to proposal format: instead of sending a PDF or Word document, buyers receive a responsive webpage. They can navigate sections, accept online, and sign — all in the browser without downloading anything. For teams where the proposal experience is part of the pitch itself, the format becomes a differentiator.

The HubSpot integration works similarly to Proposify: deal data populates templates, and view, acceptance, and signing events sync back to the CRM. Documents live in Qwilr's dashboard, so document-level reporting means going into a second platform rather than building a HubSpot report.

Key features

• Web-based proposal format — interactive, mobile-responsive, no PDF or download required
• Section-level engagement analytics: which parts buyers read, time spent, scroll depth
• Online acceptance and e-sign without an email attachment
• HubSpot integration: deal data in, engagement data and acceptance status back out

Pros

• Modern buyer experience that stands out clearly against PDF-based competitors
• Section analytics give sales reps visibility that static documents simply can't provide
• Lower per-seat entry price than Proposify or PandaDoc Business at a comparable feature tier

Cons

• Not all buyers prefer web proposals — procurement and legal teams often require a PDF for internal approvals
• No offline option: if a buyer's internet connection fails, the proposal becomes inaccessible
• Documents don't live as HubSpot records — CRM reporting requires going into Qwilr

Best for: creative agencies, high-touch SaaS, and professional services teams where the proposal moment is a key part of the sale and buyers expect a modern, interactive digital experience rather than an email attachment.

5. DocuSign — best for enterprise eSign compliance

G2: 4.5/5  ·  From $45/user/mo  ·  Free plan: No (30-day trial)

DocuSign is the category standard for electronic signatures. If your primary need is compliant, auditable signatures on documents that are already finalised in another system, DocuSign is the safest enterprise choice — almost every procurement team and legal department recognises a DocuSign envelope. That brand recognition has real value in deals where signature legitimacy matters to the counterparty.

DocuSign does not generate documents from CRM data. You upload a finished PDF or Word document, add signature fields, and send. The HubSpot connector syncs envelope status back — sent, viewed, completed, declined — but it's a narrower integration than a full document automation platform that generates documents from live HubSpot deal data.

Key features

• Industry-standard e-sign with SOC 2, ISO 27001, eIDAS, and ESIGN Act compliance
• Granular audit trail — IP address, timestamp, and signer identity recorded for every action
• HubSpot connector: envelope events sync back to deal or contact records
• In-person signing and SMS-based identity verification on higher plans
• Bulk send for high-volume agreement scenarios

Pros

• Widest enterprise recognition — buyers and procurement teams are familiar with it by name
• Best-in-class compliance certifications for regulated industries including healthcare and financial services
• Reliable, mature platform with a large integrations ecosystem

Cons

• Does not generate documents from CRM data — e-sign only, so you still need a document creation tool
• HubSpot integration is connector-level: envelope status syncs, but documents don't become HubSpot records
• Expensive relative to capabilities if you're primarily using it for straightforward signature collection

Best for: enterprise teams in regulated industries where buyer recognition and compliance certification are requirements, and where documents are already finalised in another system before a signature step is needed.

6. Dropbox Sign — best for lightweight eSignature

G2: 4.7/5  ·  From $20/user/mo  ·  Free plan: No (30-day trial)

Dropbox Sign (formerly HelloSign) sits between consumer signing tools and enterprise platforms like DocuSign — a clean, easy-to-use e-signature product at a lower price point. For teams that need reliable signatures on existing PDFs without paying DocuSign prices or managing a separate document generation platform, it's a practical middle ground.

Like DocuSign, it covers the signing step only — it doesn't generate documents from HubSpot data. The HubSpot integration sends envelope events and status back to contact and deal records, so you can see that a document was sent and signed without leaving the CRM, but the document itself lives in Dropbox Sign.

Key features

• Simple drag-and-drop field placement on PDF and Word documents
• Team templates with reusable signing field layouts for standard agreements
• HubSpot integration: send documents for signature from deals, status syncs back
• In-person signing mode and embedded signing API for custom workflows
• Audit trail with signer identity and timestamp per action

Pros

• Lower price point than DocuSign for similar core e-sign functionality
• Clean, straightforward interface — low training overhead for sales reps
• Solid compliance: SOC 2 Type II, ESIGN and UETA compliant

Cons

• No document generation from CRM data — e-sign only, documents must be created elsewhere
• HubSpot integration is narrower than native document automation tools
• Owned by Dropbox — product roadmap decisions can deprioritise HubSpot-adjacent workflows

Best for: teams that need clean, affordable e-signatures on PDFs that are already finalised — without the enterprise complexity or cost of DocuSign, and without the overhead of a full document automation platform.

7. GetAccept — best for sales engagement plus document automation

G2: 4.6/5  ·  Custom pricing  ·  Free plan: No

GetAccept combines document automation with sales engagement features — video messaging, live chat embedded inside proposals, and detailed buyer-side tracking. It's built around the idea that keeping a prospect engaged throughout the deal cycle is as important as the document itself, not just capturing a signature at the end. For teams with long, multi-stakeholder deal cycles where buyer engagement between touchpoints is uncertain, that combination has real appeal.

The HubSpot integration covers activity logging, deal updates, and document status sync. Pricing is custom and requires a demo call rather than self-serve signup, which reflects a more enterprise-focused positioning compared to tools with published rates.

Key features

• Document editor with embedded video messages, live chat, and engagement notifications
• Contract management with clause library and redlining capability
• Built-in e-sign with detailed audit trail and signer verification
• HubSpot integration: deal data in, activity and document status back out
• Buyer-side engagement tracking — see when, for how long, and which sections were reviewed

Pros

• Unique combination of engagement tools (video, live chat) alongside document generation and signing
• Strong for complex, multi-stakeholder deals where buyer engagement between sends is genuinely uncertain
• Solid audit trails and contract management for teams with meaningful legal review requirements

Cons

• Custom pricing means no self-serve evaluation — you need a sales conversation to get a number
• Engagement feature set adds complexity that's unnecessary for teams sending standard contracts or quotes
• Less HubSpot-native than tools built specifically for HubSpot-first workflows

Best for: mid-market sales teams with long deal cycles, multiple stakeholders, and a specific need to track buyer engagement between touchpoints — not teams sending standard, high-volume agreements.

8. Juro — best for legal-led contract management

G2: 4.7/5  ·  Custom pricing  ·  Free plan: No

Juro is a contract lifecycle management platform built around a collaborative browser-based editor where sales, legal, and counterparties can all negotiate within the same document. It's a step up in sophistication compared to most tools on this list — designed for organisations where legal is a regular participant in commercial deals, not just a one-time reviewer before the signature step. For straightforward send-and-sign workflows, the CLM feature set adds overhead. For legal-commercial teams that share ownership of every deal, it's the right level of control.

The HubSpot integration lets you generate contracts from deal data and sync signed contract status back. The signed documents and contract records live in Juro rather than as HubSpot objects, so pipeline reporting on contract status still requires switching tools.

Key features

• Browser-based collaborative editor with real-time redlining and clause negotiation
• Pre-approved clause library for legal teams to standardise language across all outbound agreements
• Contract lifecycle tracking — drafts, in review, out for signature, signed, renewals
• E-sign with full audit trail and signer verification
• HubSpot integration: generate contracts from deals, sync contract status back

Pros

• Best-in-class collaborative redlining — counterparties can negotiate directly in the same document
• Clause library gives legal teams real governance over what language leaves the business
• Strong for teams managing large volumes of contracts with renewals, amendments, and version control

Cons

• Enterprise pricing and a sales-led process — not suitable for small teams or self-serve evaluation
• More complexity than most HubSpot sales teams need if contracts are standard and rarely negotiated
• Documents live in Juro, not HubSpot — pipeline reporting still requires switching tools

Best for: companies with active legal involvement in commercial deals and a genuine need for contract negotiation, version control, and renewal management — not straightforward send-and-sign workflows or small teams testing automation.

9. HubSpot Quotes — best for free native quoting

G2: 4.4/5 (Sales Hub)  ·  $0 with Sales Hub  ·  Free plan: Yes

HubSpot Quotes is the built-in quoting tool inside HubSpot Sales Hub. It doesn't require a third-party integration because it is HubSpot — quotes pull in deal and line item data, generate a shareable link or PDF, and record acceptance back on the deal record natively. For teams that need basic quoting and are already paying for HubSpot, it costs nothing extra.

The limitations are real: no support for complex custom templates, no multi-step approval workflows, no built-in e-sign (without HubSpot's separate e-sign add-on), and no support for non-quote document types like proposals, contracts, or NDAs. It's quoting, not document automation — but for teams that need free native quoting and nothing more, it's already in your portal.

Key features

• Pull deal, contact, and line item data directly — no mapping or configuration required
• Branded quote templates with your company logo and colours
• Quote acceptance recorded on the HubSpot deal record automatically
• Payment collection via HubSpot Payments (US) or Stripe integration
• Included with HubSpot Sales Hub Starter, Professional, and Enterprise

Pros

• Zero additional cost if you're already on HubSpot Sales Hub — it's already in the platform
• Deepest HubSpot data connection of any tool on this list — it's native, not an integration
• No setup or configuration required — available immediately in any Sales Hub portal

Cons

• Templates are limited — no support for custom Google Docs or Word layouts
• Quotes only — not suitable for contracts, proposals, NDAs, or any non-quote document type
• No built-in e-sign without purchasing a separate HubSpot add-on
• No multi-step approval routing beyond basic HubSpot workflow logic

Best for: HubSpot teams that need simple quotes only and want a free-forever option before investing in a dedicated document automation tool. Use it to validate your quoting workflow, then move to Portant when you need custom templates, approval routing, contracts, or full e-sign built into the document lifecycle.

10. Signaturely — best for simple, affordable eSign

G2: 4.8/5  ·  From $25/mo  ·  Free plan: No (3 free signing requests)

Signaturely is one of the highest-rated e-sign tools on G2 for a clear reason: it's genuinely simple, affordable, and focused on the job of collecting a signature. Where DocuSign and Dropbox Sign can feel like they were built for enterprise legal departments, Signaturely was designed for small businesses and teams who need fast, reliable signing without a steep learning curve or a large monthly bill.

HubSpot integration runs via Zapier rather than a native connector, which adds some setup friction compared to tools with a direct integration. For teams where tight HubSpot workflow automation matters — triggering a document from a deal stage change, writing signature status back as a HubSpot property — that trade-off is worth thinking through carefully before committing.

Key features

• Upload PDFs and Word files, add signing fields, and send in minutes
• Document templates with reusable field placements for standard agreements
• Signing links for one-to-many signing scenarios
• Audit trail and tamper-evident certificates on every completed document
• HubSpot integration via Zapier

Pros

• Highest G2 rating on this list — consistently praised for simplicity and reliability across many reviewers
• Low price point — affordable for solo operators, freelancers, and small teams
• Fast to set up and learn — most users are collecting signatures the same day they sign up

Cons

• No native HubSpot integration — Zapier is required, which adds cost and setup complexity
• No document generation from CRM data — e-sign only, documents must be created elsewhere
• Limited for complex multi-step approval workflows or high-volume automated document sending

Best for: small businesses, freelancers, and solo operators who need a reliable, affordable way to collect signatures on existing documents — without the overhead of a full document automation platform or the enterprise pricing of DocuSign.

How to choose the right tool

The fastest way to narrow this list is to answer three questions directly before evaluating demos or trials.

Do you need to generate documents, or just sign them? If you're starting from a blank Google Doc or Word template that needs to be auto-filled with HubSpot deal data before sending, you need document generation — Portant, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, or GetAccept. If you already have finished documents and only need to collect signatures on them, DocuSign, Dropbox Sign, or Signaturely are more cost-effective and less complex.

Where does your team's source of truth need to live? If HubSpot is the system your managers, ops team, and finance team actually use to track what's happening in the pipeline, you need a tool that writes document status back to HubSpot as properties — not just activity log entries. Portant and HubSpot Quotes do this natively. Editor-first platforms like PandaDoc and Proposify sync status back, but the authoritative document records stay in their own dashboards.

What does your team size do to the total cost? Per-seat pricing compounds fast. At five users: PandaDoc Business ($245/mo), Proposify ($245/mo), DocuSign Standard ($225/mo), Qwilr ($175/mo) vs Portant Team ($125/mo for 5 users). At ten users the gap becomes dramatic. If headcount is growing, flat-rate workspace pricing changes the economics significantly over a 12-month horizon.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best Hyperline alternative for HubSpot teams?

Portant is the strongest Hyperline alternative for HubSpot teams that need document automation — not billing. Hyperline manages subscriptions and usage-based billing. Portant generates proposals, contracts, and NDAs from HubSpot data, collects e-signatures, and stores every signed document back on the deal record. For sales teams that need the full pre-close document lifecycle inside HubSpot, Portant is purpose-built for that workflow.

Why do teams switch from Hyperline?

Teams don't typically switch from Hyperline — they realise it was never the right tool for what they needed. Hyperline handles recurring billing, metered usage, and subscription management. When HubSpot sales teams need to generate proposals, contracts, and quotes from deal data and collect e-signatures, they need a dedicated document automation platform. The most common realisation is that Hyperline's document output is invoices, not sales documents.

Is there a free Hyperline alternative for document automation?

Yes. Portant has a free plan (up to 30 credits per month, with e-signature included) and HubSpot Quotes is free with any HubSpot Sales Hub plan. Portant's free tier lets small teams test the full document automation workflow — generate, send, and sign — before committing to a paid workspace. HubSpot Quotes covers basic quoting at no additional cost if you're already on Sales Hub.

What is the cheapest Hyperline alternative for HubSpot?

Portant is the cheapest full-featured document automation alternative for HubSpot teams. Its Pro plan is $42 per month for the entire workspace — not per user. Hyperline doesn't publish pricing publicly and requires a sales conversation. A five-person team on Portant Team pays $125 per month. Comparable per-seat tools like PandaDoc Business cost $245 per month for the same team size.

Is Portant better than Hyperline for HubSpot teams?

For document automation, yes — but they solve entirely different problems. Portant is a HubSpot-certified document automation app that generates proposals, contracts, and NDAs from Google Docs or Word templates, collects e-signatures, and writes every document status back to HubSpot as a record. Hyperline is a subscription billing platform. Many teams use both: Portant handles pre-close document workflows while Hyperline handles post-close billing and recurring revenue.

Does Hyperline integrate with HubSpot?

Hyperline does have a HubSpot integration, but it syncs billing and subscription data — not document generation from deal records. If you need to trigger document creation from HubSpot deal stage changes, auto-fill contract templates with contact and line item data, or route documents through an approval workflow before sending for signature, Portant's native HubSpot integration covers all of that. Hyperline's integration is designed for finance and RevOps teams managing billing data, not sales teams managing document workflows.

What is the best Hyperline alternative for small businesses?

Portant is the best Hyperline alternative for small businesses that need document automation inside HubSpot. Flat workspace pricing means you're not penalised as the team grows, and the free tier lets you start without a credit card. For small businesses that only need simple e-signatures on existing PDFs — without document generation from HubSpot data — Dropbox Sign or Signaturely are more affordable e-sign-only options. For free native quoting, HubSpot Quotes is already in your portal at no extra cost.