Best Documint alternatives for HubSpot teams (2026)

Documint is a solid document generation tool — but it wasn't designed for teams that live inside HubSpot. There's no native HubSpot integration: connecting Documint to your CRM requires Zapier or Make as middleware, adding monthly cost, maintenance overhead, and a layer of fragility to every document trigger. And when your generated document needs a signature, you're adding a third tool on top. As document workflows mature, teams start asking whether they should be stitching together three platforms or using one that handles the whole lifecycle natively.

I work at Portant, so I'll be upfront about that. But I also spend most of my time inside customer HubSpot portals, and I've seen what actually gets people shopping. This article evaluates 10 alternatives honestly — including where each one beats Portant and where it doesn't. I scored them on four criteria: HubSpot integration depth, template flexibility, pricing at a five-user team, and end-to-end document lifecycle coverage.

Why HubSpot teams look for Documint alternatives

The friction I hear most often falls into three categories. The first is the HubSpot connection itself. Documint's architecture is built around Google Sheets and Google Forms as data sources. To get HubSpot deal data into a Documint template, you need a Zapier or Make workflow sitting in the middle — and anyone who's run a Zap-dependent document workflow for a few months knows they break, add latency, and require constant babysitting.

The second issue is eSignatures. After generating a document in Documint, collecting a signature requires a separate tool. That might be DocuSign, HelloSign, or something else — but it's another subscription, another login, another point of failure in the chain. For teams sending contracts and agreements at any kind of volume, that friction compounds daily.

The third is lifecycle coverage. Documint does the generation step well. But approval routing before sending, document status tracked as a HubSpot property, and signed copies stored back on the deal record — those are all outside Documint's scope. Teams that need the full document lifecycle in one place typically find that Documint gets them partway there and then requires assembling the rest themselves.

Quick comparison

Tool	Best for	HubSpot integration	Starting price	Free plan	G2
Portant	HubSpot-native doc automation	Native (certified app)	$42/mo workspace	Yes (30 docs/mo)	4.7/5
PandaDoc	Proposal and contract creation	Integration (sync)	$49/user/mo	No (14-day trial)	4.7/5
Proposify	Editor-first proposals	Integration (sync)	$49/user/mo	No (14-day trial)	4.6/5
Qwilr	Interactive web proposals	Integration (sync)	$35/user/mo	No (14-day trial)	4.5/5
DocuSign	Enterprise eSign compliance	Connector (envelope sync)	$45/user/mo	No (30-day trial)	4.5/5
Dropbox Sign	Lightweight eSign	Integration (sync)	$20/user/mo	No (30-day trial)	4.7/5
GetAccept	Sales engagement + docs	Integration (sync)	Custom pricing	No	4.6/5
Juro	Legal-led contract workflows	Integration (sync)	Custom pricing	No	4.7/5
HubSpot Quotes	Free native quotes	Native (built into HubSpot)	$0 with Sales Hub	Yes	4.4/5
Signaturely	Simple, affordable eSign	Via Zapier	From $25/mo	No (3 free requests)	4.8/5

G2 ratings as of May 2026. Prices shown are billed annually where applicable — check each vendor's site for current rates.

1. Portant — best for HubSpot-native document automation

G2: 4.7/5  ·  From $42/mo workspace  ·  Free plan: Yes (30 docs/mo)

Portant is purpose-built for teams that use HubSpot as their primary system of record and want documents to live there too — not alongside it in a stack of Zapier glue. It's the #1 HubSpot-certified document automation app, used by over 920,000 people, and the core architectural difference from Documint is where the integration actually lives.

With Documint, the integration is external: you build a Zap to push HubSpot data into Documint, generate the document, and then manually handle the rest. With Portant, the integration is native — it runs as a certified app inside HubSpot. There's no middleware layer, no Zapier subscription, and no Zap to maintain. When a deal stage changes, a form is submitted, or a workflow action fires, Portant triggers directly from HubSpot. No relay.

Templates stay in the formats your team already uses. Google Docs, Slides, Word, PowerPoint, and existing PDFs all work as source files — the same files Documint also supports for generation, but without requiring an external data pipeline to fill them. Merge tags pull in deal, contact, company, line item, and custom property data directly from HubSpot. If legal has already approved a template in Google Docs, it goes straight to work. No rebuilding, no reformatting.

The second major difference is eSignatures. Documint has none. Portant includes built-in eSign on all paid plans: signature fields are placed in the template, the document is sent for signing, and when the recipient signs, the status writes back to the HubSpot deal record automatically. There's no DocuSign subscription, no HelloSign webhook, and no manual step between "document sent" and "signed copy on the deal."

The third difference is the document lifecycle. Documint generates and delivers. Portant generates, routes for approval, sends for signature, stores the signed copy on the deal record, and gives managers a live view of document status inside HubSpot — all in one platform. Document status becomes a HubSpot property, which means you can build workflows triggered by signing events, run reports on time-to-sign by deal stage, or build lists of deals with unsigned contracts outstanding.

Key features

• Generates documents from live HubSpot deal, contact, company, and line item data — no middleware
• Templates in Google Docs, Slides, Word, PowerPoint, or PDF — no proprietary editor
• Every document saved back to HubSpot as its own record linked to the deal or contact
• Sequential approval workflows with one-click approve/reject from inside HubSpot
• Built-in eSignature on all paid plans — status updates HubSpot at each signing step
• Automation triggers: generate documents from deal stage changes, form submissions, or workflow actions
• Conditional content logic — show or hide sections based on HubSpot field values
• Dynamic line item tables pulled directly from HubSpot products

Pros

• No middleware required — native HubSpot integration with no Zapier or Make subscription needed
• eSignatures built in on every paid plan — no separate tool, no extra cost per signature
• Documents as HubSpot records means reporting, list-building, and workflow automation work natively
• Flat workspace pricing covers the whole team without per-seat penalties
• Fast to set up — most teams are generating real documents inside HubSpot the same day

Cons

• No visual drag-and-drop builder — if reps want to design rich layouts from scratch inside the tool, the template-file approach feels less visual than a dedicated proposal editor
• Document volume limits apply on lower plans (30 docs/mo free, 2,000/mo on Pro)

For a detailed side-by-side, our Portant vs Documint comparison page covers features, pricing, and integration depth in full.

2. PandaDoc — best for proposal and contract creation with eSign

G2: 4.7/5  ·  From $49/user/mo  ·  Free plan: No (14-day trial)

PandaDoc is probably the most well-known document automation platform in the market, and it solves the two problems Documint leaves open: it has a native HubSpot integration and it includes built-in eSignatures. For teams switching from Documint specifically because of the middleware gap and the missing signing step, PandaDoc covers both in a single platform.

The HubSpot integration lets you pull deal data directly into PandaDoc templates, and document status syncs back to the deal record. Where PandaDoc differs from a fully HubSpot-native tool is that documents still live in PandaDoc's dashboard — not as HubSpot records you can run reports on or trigger workflows from. For reporting on document status across your pipeline, you're going into PandaDoc rather than building a HubSpot dashboard.

The other trade-off is pricing. PandaDoc Business — the plan that includes HubSpot integration, approval workflows, and custom fields — is $49 per user per month. A five-person team pays $245/month. Coming from Documint's $29 Starter tier, that's a significant step up.

Key features

• Visual block-based editor with drag-and-drop sections and a reusable content library
• Built-in eSignature with detailed audit trail and signer verification
• HubSpot integration: deal data in, document status and activity back out
• Approval workflows and in-document comments for collaborative review
• Interactive pricing tables with buyer-selectable line items

Pros

• Solves both gaps that Documint leaves: native HubSpot integration and built-in eSign
• Rich visual editor is more capable than template-file approaches for heavily designed proposals
• Strong content library for teams that send many proposals from standardised building blocks

Cons

• Per-seat pricing at $49/user/mo scales quickly — a 5-person team pays $245/mo
• Templates must be built inside PandaDoc — existing Google Docs or Word files need to be recreated
• Documents live in PandaDoc, not HubSpot — pipeline reporting requires a second dashboard

Best for: teams that need a polished proposal editor and eSign in one tool and are comfortable rebuilding templates inside PandaDoc's environment. If you're switching from Documint because of the middleware gap, PandaDoc closes it — but the per-seat cost is substantially higher.

3. Proposify — best for editor-first proposal creation

G2: 4.6/5  ·  From $49/user/mo  ·  Free plan: No (14-day trial)

Proposify is a dedicated proposal platform built around a visual block editor, content library, and collaborative review workflow. Where Documint is focused on document generation from data sources, Proposify is focused on the design and presentation of the proposal itself. If your team sends heavily branded, visually rich proposals and the aesthetic of the document matters as much as the data in it, Proposify is a strong option in that category.

The HubSpot integration syncs deal data into proposals and logs activity back to HubSpot — sent, viewed, signed events appear on the timeline. But like PandaDoc, documents live in Proposify, not HubSpot. Reporting on proposal status means going into Proposify rather than building a HubSpot report or list.

Key features

• Visual block-based editor with drag-and-drop sections and a reusable content library
• eSignature, interactive pricing tables, and video embedding built in
• Approval workflows and real-time viewer notifications when buyers open the proposal
• HubSpot integration: deal data in, activity and status back out
• Analytics: time spent per section, scroll depth, signer activity

Pros

• Polished editor that most reps find easy to use for layout-heavy, visually driven proposals
• Strong content library for teams that need consistent branded sections across many proposals
• Robust engagement analytics — including section-level attention data most tools don't offer

Cons

• Per-seat pricing at $49/user/mo — a 5-person team pays $245/mo
• Documents live in Proposify, not HubSpot — managers need to leave the CRM for document status
• Not a native HubSpot app — deeper reporting requires manual effort or third-party connectors

Best for: teams that want a polished editor-first experience and have admin time to maintain a content library. If you're leaving Documint because the middleware was too fragile, Proposify adds a direct HubSpot sync — but you're still managing proposals in a second tool.

4. Qwilr — best for interactive web-based proposals

G2: 4.5/5  ·  From $35/user/mo  ·  Free plan: No (14-day trial)

Qwilr takes a fundamentally different approach to the document format: instead of sending a PDF, buyers receive a responsive webpage. They can scroll through sections, accept online, and sign — all in the browser without downloading anything. For teams where the proposal experience is part of the pitch, the format itself becomes a differentiator that a PDF-based tool like Documint can't replicate.

The HubSpot integration follows the same pattern as Proposify: deal data flows into the template, and view, acceptance, and signing events sync back to the deal timeline. Documents live in Qwilr's dashboard rather than as HubSpot records. At $35/user/mo it's cheaper than PandaDoc or Proposify at the same feature tier, which makes it worth evaluating if the web-based format fits your sales motion.

Key features

• Web-based proposal format — interactive, mobile-responsive, no PDF required
• Section-level engagement analytics: which parts buyers read, time spent, scroll depth
• Online acceptance and eSign without an email attachment
• HubSpot integration: deal data in, engagement data and status back out
• Custom domain and branding for proposal URLs

Pros

• Modern buyer experience that stands out against PDF-based competitors
• Section-level analytics give sales reps visibility that static documents simply can't match
• Lower per-seat price than Proposify or PandaDoc Business at the same feature tier

Cons

• Not all buyers prefer web proposals — procurement teams often require a PDF for internal approvals
• No offline option: if a buyer's internet connection drops, the proposal is inaccessible
• Documents don't live in HubSpot — CRM reporting requires going into Qwilr

Best for: creative agencies, high-touch SaaS, and professional services teams where the proposal moment is a key part of the sale and buyers expect a modern digital experience over a PDF attachment.

5. DocuSign — best for enterprise eSign compliance

G2: 4.5/5  ·  From $45/user/mo  ·  Free plan: No (30-day trial)

DocuSign is the category standard for electronic signatures. If your use case is specifically about compliant, auditable signatures on documents that are already finalised somewhere else, DocuSign is the safest choice for enterprise requirements, legal scrutiny, and buyer recognition. Almost every procurement team and enterprise buyer recognises a DocuSign envelope, and that recognition carries real value in regulated industries.

It's worth being clear about what DocuSign doesn't do: it doesn't generate documents from CRM data, and it doesn't replace Documint's document generation capability. You upload a PDF or Word document, add signature fields, and send. For teams using Documint who need to solve the signing gap specifically, DocuSign covers that step — but you'd still need the generation layer, meaning you'd be running three tools rather than one.

Key features

• Industry-standard eSign with SOC 2, ISO 27001, eIDAS, and ESIGN Act compliance
• Granular audit trail — IP address, timestamp, and signer identity for every action
• HubSpot connector: envelope events sync back to deal or contact records
• In-person signing and SMS-based identity verification on higher plans
• Bulk send for high-volume agreement scenarios

Pros

• Widest enterprise recognition — buyers and procurement teams expect it
• Best-in-class compliance certifications for regulated industries
• Reliable and mature platform with a large integrations ecosystem

Cons

• Does not generate documents from CRM data — eSign only, so it only partially replaces Documint
• HubSpot integration is connector-level: envelope status syncs, but documents don't live as HubSpot records
• Expensive relative to capabilities if your primary need is basic signatures on standard agreements

Best for: enterprise teams in regulated industries where buyer recognition and compliance certification matter, and where documents are already finalised in another system before signature is needed.

6. Dropbox Sign — best for lightweight eSignature

G2: 4.7/5  ·  From $20/user/mo  ·  Free plan: No (30-day trial)

Dropbox Sign (formerly HelloSign) is a clean, easy-to-use eSignature platform that sits between the simplicity of consumer tools and the enterprise overhead of DocuSign. It's the kind of tool that comes up when teams using Documint want to add signing without committing to a full document automation platform switchover — just a clean signing layer on top of PDFs they've already generated.

The HubSpot integration sends envelope events and status back to contact and deal records: sent, viewed, signed events appear on the timeline. Like DocuSign, it covers the signing step only — it doesn't generate documents from HubSpot data. At $20/user/mo it's the most affordable dedicated eSign tool with a genuine HubSpot integration on this list.

Key features

• Simple drag-and-drop field placement on PDF and Word documents
• Team templates with reusable signing field layouts
• HubSpot integration: send documents for signature from deals, status syncs back
• In-person signing mode and embedded signing API for custom workflows
• Audit trail with signer identity and timestamp per action

Pros

• Lower price point than DocuSign for similar eSign functionality
• Clean, simple interface — low training overhead for reps
• Reliable compliance: SOC 2 Type II, ESIGN and UETA compliant

Cons

• No document generation from CRM data — eSign only, same gap as DocuSign
• HubSpot integration is narrower than native tools — status syncs but documents aren't HubSpot records
• Owned by Dropbox — roadmap decisions can deprioritise HubSpot-adjacent workflows

Best for: teams that need clean, affordable eSignatures on PDFs that are already finalised, without the enterprise complexity or pricing of DocuSign. Pairs well with a document generation layer if you want to keep Documint for generation and add a signing step.

7. GetAccept — best for sales engagement plus documents

G2: 4.6/5  ·  Custom pricing  ·  Free plan: No

GetAccept combines document automation with sales engagement features — video messaging, live chat embedded inside proposals, and buyer-side engagement tracking. It's more than a document tool: it's built around the idea of keeping prospects engaged throughout the deal cycle, not just at the point of signature. For teams that find documents disappearing into inboxes without response, the engagement layer addresses that problem directly.

The HubSpot integration covers activity logging, deal updates, and document status sync. Pricing is custom, which means a demo conversation is required before you can see a number — a sign of its more enterprise-focused positioning compared to self-serve tools like Documint or Portant.

Key features

• Document editor with embedded video, live chat, and engagement notifications
• Contract management with clause library and redlining capabilities
• Built-in eSign with detailed audit trail
• HubSpot integration: deal data in, activity and document status back out
• Buyer-side engagement tracking — see when, how long, and what sections they reviewed

Pros

• Unique combination of engagement tools (video, live chat) alongside document automation
• Strong for complex, multi-stakeholder deals where buyer engagement between touchpoints is uncertain
• Solid audit trails and contract management for teams with legal requirements

Cons

• Custom pricing means no self-serve — you need a sales conversation before you get a number
• The engagement feature set adds complexity that's overkill for teams sending standard contracts or quotes
• Less HubSpot-native than tools built specifically for the HubSpot ecosystem

Best for: mid-market sales teams with long deal cycles, multiple stakeholders, and a need to track buyer engagement between touchpoints — not teams sending straightforward agreements that just need a signature returned.

8. Juro — best for legal-led contract management

G2: 4.7/5  ·  Custom pricing  ·  Free plan: No

Juro is a contract lifecycle management platform built around a collaborative browser-based editor where sales, legal, and counterparties can all negotiate in the same document. It's a step up in sophistication from what Documint offers — designed for organisations where legal is a regular participant in deals, reviewing and marking up every agreement before signature, not just a one-time approver at the end.

The HubSpot integration lets you generate contracts from deal data and sync signed contract status back. For straightforward sales teams sending standard agreements, the CLM feature set adds overhead they don't need. For legal-commercial teams that share ownership of every deal and regularly negotiate contract terms, it's the right level of control.

Key features

• Browser-based collaborative editor with real-time redlining and clause negotiation
• Pre-approved clause library for legal teams to standardise language across all agreements
• Contract lifecycle tracking — drafts, in review, out for signature, signed, renewals
• eSign with full audit trail and signer verification
• HubSpot integration: generate from deals, sync contract status back

Pros

• Best-in-class collaborative redlining — counterparties can negotiate directly in the document
• Clause library gives legal real control over what language leaves the building
• Strong for teams managing large contract volumes with renewals, amendments, and version control

Cons

• Enterprise pricing and a sales-led process — not suitable for small teams or self-serve evaluation
• More complexity than most HubSpot sales teams need if contracts are standard and rarely negotiated
• Documents live in Juro, not HubSpot — pipeline reporting still requires switching tools

Best for: companies with active legal involvement in commercial deals and a genuine need for contract negotiation, version control, and renewal management — not teams running straightforward send-and-sign workflows.

9. HubSpot Quotes — best for free native quoting

G2: 4.4/5 (Sales Hub)  ·  $0 with Sales Hub  ·  Free plan: Yes

HubSpot Quotes is the built-in quoting tool inside HubSpot Sales Hub. It doesn't require any integration because it is HubSpot — quotes pull in deal and line item data, generate a shareable link or PDF, and record acceptance back to the deal natively. For teams that need basic quoting and are already paying for HubSpot, it costs nothing extra and is already in your portal.

The limitations are real: no custom templates beyond HubSpot's branded layouts, no support for complex document types like contracts, proposals, or NDAs, and no built-in eSign without adding HubSpot's separate sign add-on. It's quoting, not document automation. But as a free starting point before investing in a dedicated tool, it's worth knowing about.

Key features

• Pull deal, contact, and line item data directly — no mapping required
• Branded quote templates with your company logo and colours
• Quote acceptance recorded on the HubSpot deal record
• Payment collection via HubSpot Payments (US) or Stripe integration
• Included with HubSpot Sales Hub Starter, Professional, and Enterprise

Pros

• Zero additional cost if you're already on HubSpot Sales Hub
• Deepest HubSpot data connection of any tool on this list — it's native, not integrated
• No setup required — it's already in your portal

Cons

• Templates are limited — no support for custom Google Docs or Word layouts
• Quotes only — not suitable for contracts, proposals, NDAs, or any other document type
• No built-in eSign without a separate HubSpot add-on
• No multi-step approval routing beyond basic HubSpot workflow logic

Best for: HubSpot teams that need simple quotes only and want the free-forever option before investing in a dedicated document automation tool. Use it to establish your quoting workflow, then graduate to Portant when you need custom templates, approvals, contracts, or full eSign.

10. Signaturely — best for simple, affordable eSign

G2: 4.8/5  ·  From $25/mo  ·  Free plan: No (3 free signing requests)

Signaturely is one of the highest-rated eSign tools on G2 for a simple reason: it's genuinely easy to use, affordable, and focused. Where DocuSign and Dropbox Sign can feel like they were built for enterprise legal departments, Signaturely was designed for small businesses and freelancers who need fast, reliable signing without a steep learning curve or enterprise contract commitments.

For teams currently on Documint that want to add a signing step without committing to a full platform switch, Signaturely is one of the most affordable ways to do it. The caveat is the HubSpot connection: Signaturely integrates with HubSpot via Zapier rather than a native connector, which is the same category of problem that drives people away from Documint in the first place. If tight HubSpot workflow automation matters, that trade-off is worth weighing carefully.

Key features

• Upload PDFs and Word files, add signing fields, send in minutes
• Document templates with reusable field placements for regularly sent agreements
• Signing links for one-to-many signing scenarios
• Audit trail and tamper-evident certificates
• HubSpot integration via Zapier

Pros

• Highest G2 rating on this list — consistently praised for simplicity and reliability by real users
• Low price point — affordable for solo operators and small teams on tight budgets
• Fast to set up and learn — most users are sending documents for signature the same day

Cons

• No native HubSpot integration — Zapier required, which adds cost and setup complexity
• No document generation from CRM data — eSign only
• Limited for complex multi-step approval workflows or high-volume automated sending

Best for: small businesses, freelancers, and solo operators who need a reliable, affordable way to collect signatures on existing documents — without the overhead of a full document automation platform or a lengthy enterprise sales process.

How to choose the right tool

The fastest way to narrow this list to two or three candidates is to answer these three questions directly:

What problem are you actually trying to solve? If the core issue with Documint is the Zapier dependency — the fragility, the cost, the latency — you need a tool with a native HubSpot integration. That rules out Signaturely and significantly complicates things with DocuSign and Dropbox Sign, which also require connectors rather than certified apps. Portant, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, and GetAccept all have more direct HubSpot integrations.

Do you need eSignatures in the same workflow? Documint's absence of built-in signing is one of its most commonly cited limitations. If you want to generate and sign without switching tools, Portant, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, GetAccept, and Juro all include eSign natively. If you're happy to keep generation and signing separate, the dedicated signing tools (DocuSign, Dropbox Sign, Signaturely) are more affordable for the signing step alone.

How does your team size affect pricing? Per-seat pricing compounds fast. At five users: PandaDoc Business ($245/mo), Proposify ($245/mo), DocuSign Standard ($225/mo), Qwilr ($175/mo) vs Portant Pro ($42/mo flat for the workspace). At ten users the gap becomes dramatic. If the team is growing, flat-rate tools are significantly cheaper over a twelve-month horizon.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best Documint alternative for HubSpot teams?

Portant is the strongest Documint alternative for HubSpot-first teams. Unlike Documint, which requires Zapier or Make to reach HubSpot, Portant is a certified HubSpot app that runs natively inside the CRM. Every document is saved as a HubSpot record, eSignatures are built in on all paid plans, and approval workflows are included — covering the full document lifecycle without any middleware or additional subscriptions.

Why do teams switch from Documint?

The most common reasons are the lack of a native HubSpot integration (Documint requires Zapier or Make as middleware, which adds cost and breaks without warning), no built-in eSignatures (a separate DocuSign or HelloSign subscription is required), and the absence of approval workflows. Teams that want a single platform covering generate, approve, sign, and track — all inside HubSpot — find Documint's architecture too fragmented as their document workflows mature.

Is there a free Documint alternative?

Yes. Portant has a free plan that includes HubSpot integration, basic document generation, and a single eSignature per document — with no middleware required. HubSpot Quotes is also free with any HubSpot Sales Hub plan for teams that only need basic quoting. Documint itself offers a free trial but no ongoing free tier.

What is the cheapest Documint alternative for HubSpot teams?

Portant is the cheapest full-featured alternative on a total-cost basis. Documint Starter is $29/mo, but connecting it to HubSpot requires a Zapier subscription ($20–50+/mo) plus a separate eSign tool on top. Portant Pro is $42/mo for the whole workspace — native HubSpot integration, built-in eSignatures, and no middleware costs included in that single price.

Does Documint integrate natively with HubSpot?

No. Documint does not have a native HubSpot integration. To connect Documint to HubSpot you need a third-party middleware tool such as Zapier or Make, which adds monthly cost and requires ongoing maintenance. Portant connects directly to HubSpot as a certified app — no middleware required, and document generation can be triggered directly from HubSpot deal stages, workflow actions, and form submissions.

Is Portant better than Documint for HubSpot teams?

For HubSpot teams, yes. Portant is purpose-built for HubSpot: it connects natively as a certified app, generates documents from live CRM data without middleware, saves every document as a HubSpot record, and includes built-in eSignatures and approval workflows. Documint is a capable document generation tool for Google Sheets and Forms workflows, but it was not designed with HubSpot as its primary data source.

What is the best Documint alternative for small businesses?

Portant is the best Documint alternative for small businesses using HubSpot. Its flat workspace pricing means the whole team is covered without per-seat penalties, and the free plan lets small teams start generating documents at no cost before committing to a paid plan. For businesses that only need eSignatures on existing PDFs without any document generation, Dropbox Sign or Signaturely offer affordable signing-only options at a lower monthly cost.